As the United States Congress faces the onerous task of
funding massive disaster recovery efforts and a multi-trillion dollar federal
budget, taxation is stage center in Washington. The task is further complicated
by the need to reform the law apportioning taxes amidst the caterwauling of
lobbyists for special interests. We argue that none of this is necessary:
in the Age of the Internet and Worldwide Web Congress can eliminate all
income taxes and establish crowdfunding as the means to pay for all government
expenses.
The switch could pay off the national debt in short order, get the economy firing on all cylinders, virtually wipe out unemployment and end the homeless problem in America.
How would it work? There are several ways to institutionalize crowdfunding. My favorites are web-based lotteries offering as prizes travel packages to tourists and housing to Americans.
The Numbers
The Trump
administration’s 2017 budget proposal totals $3.65 trillion
($3,650,000,000,000). Revenues from taxes are estimated at $3.21 trillion
($3,210,000,000,000). That leaves a deficit of $443 billion, adding to the
national debt now standing at over $20 trillion ($20,382,178,657,059).
To generate revenues on that scale Congress should authorize two new federal agencies, one to run the lottery for tourists, the other offering apartments and houses as prizes. They would sell as many tickets for each prize as needed to pay costs, plus an additional number to replace tax revenues.
Tourism Lottery
To generate revenues on that scale Congress should authorize two new federal agencies, one to run the lottery for tourists, the other offering apartments and houses as prizes. They would sell as many tickets for each prize as needed to pay costs, plus an additional number to replace tax revenues.
Tourism Lottery
Consider the
math. Some 75 million tourists visit the United States each year. Say the
average prize (travel and hotel package) costs $10,000. The tourism agency
would have to sell just 10,000 $1 tickets to generate that amount of revenue, a
ridiculously low figure. It could easily sell an additional 100,000 $1 tickets
to generate tax revenue. At that rate, it would generate $7,500,000,000,000 annually,
more than double the amount needed for the 2017 budget.
The actual packaging of tours would remain in the hands of those who now handle the business; but they would be paid by the lottery rather than by individual tourists. As the odds of winning one of the 75 million prizes on offer would be excellent the lottery can be expected to sell out its tickets in short order.
Housing Lottery
The actual packaging of tours would remain in the hands of those who now handle the business; but they would be paid by the lottery rather than by individual tourists. As the odds of winning one of the 75 million prizes on offer would be excellent the lottery can be expected to sell out its tickets in short order.
Housing Lottery
In the 12 months preceding August 2017 there were over seven
million private homes for sale in the United States and 14.39 million housing
starts. For the purpose of calculation, let us say the lottery would have
approximately 12 million prizes. On the basis of the national median sale price
of $300,200 for an American house in August 2017, that would mean selling 300,200
$1 tickets to cover costs, plus whatever level is authorized by Congress for
revenue purposes. If that is 100,000 $1 tickets per house, it would generate an
annual revenue of $1.2 trillion ($1,200,000,000,000).
In addition to making houses available for the price of a $1 lottery ticket, these arrangements would optimize efficiencies in the housing sector. Builders could sell out entire housing estates in a day and get right back to the next project. Realtors would have the happy prospect of dealing with the secondary market created by those who win houses and want to sell them immediately. Further, if a quota of prizes were made available only to the very poor, it could end the problem of homelessness in America.
Many Benefits
There would be many direct and subsidiary benefits from eliminating taxation as a source of revenue. The primary direct benefit would be in the immediate universal raising of incomes. Perhaps as important a benefit would be eliminating the need to maintain the accounting and record-keeping infrastructure necessary to satisfy the taxman.
In addition to making houses available for the price of a $1 lottery ticket, these arrangements would optimize efficiencies in the housing sector. Builders could sell out entire housing estates in a day and get right back to the next project. Realtors would have the happy prospect of dealing with the secondary market created by those who win houses and want to sell them immediately. Further, if a quota of prizes were made available only to the very poor, it could end the problem of homelessness in America.
Many Benefits
There would be many direct and subsidiary benefits from eliminating taxation as a source of revenue. The primary direct benefit would be in the immediate universal raising of incomes. Perhaps as important a benefit would be eliminating the need to maintain the accounting and record-keeping infrastructure necessary to satisfy the taxman.
Also, without personal or corporate income tax to dodge, an
entire sector of criminality would be wiped out instantly. American
corporations could bring home huge amounts of capital now stashed abroad.
Investors all around the world would compete to enter the American market. All
the massive infrastructure investments of the country could be easily met.
Unemployment would be reduced to minimal levels. And not least, the national
debt could be paid off.
Healthy Disruptions
Of course, these changes will be hugely disruptive of the
banking, accounting and lawyering professions. In fact, we can argue that the
change would shift the entire capitalist system into new territory. But that is
not a reason for avoiding crowdfunding. Unless we make the shift to a new
economic system the galloping advance of Artificial Intelligence will create
massive waves of unemployment, opening the world to unrest and possibly
revolutionary violence similar to what it witnessed at the onset of the
Industrial Age.
The disruptions of transition to crowdfunding should be seen as draining the swamp built up by vested interests in the last five centuries of corporate capitalism. As Adam Smith explained at great length in The Wealth of Nations (1776), corporations unavoidably create corruption and waste because of their inefficiencies in controlling massive amounts of “other people’s money.” Taxation has become part of the swamp, supporting a punitive system of surveillance and exaction that has become the enemy of liberty around the world.
The disruptions of transition to crowdfunding should be seen as draining the swamp built up by vested interests in the last five centuries of corporate capitalism. As Adam Smith explained at great length in The Wealth of Nations (1776), corporations unavoidably create corruption and waste because of their inefficiencies in controlling massive amounts of “other people’s money.” Taxation has become part of the swamp, supporting a punitive system of surveillance and exaction that has become the enemy of liberty around the world.
A New Capitalism
The possibilities for crowdfunding coincide with the
development of two technologies – 3D printing and off-grid renewable energy –
that allow decentralized manufacturing of the finest industrial products
on the smallest scale. That shift implies the end of many major trends of the
industrial era dominated by mega-corporations, especially the growth of cities
based on manufacturing.
In the future now taking shape, the wealth of
nations will not come from heavy industry or long-distance trade in
commodities but from the innovative talents and skills of individuals. More
than at any time in the past, societies that nourish liberty will be rich;
those who do not will be poor.
No comments:
Post a Comment